The Human Side of Firefighting (Pt. 2)

ARTICLE

The Human Side of Firefighting (Pt. 2)

Author: Bob De Rydt
September 22, 2025

A fortnight ago we shared the results of a poll amongst our followers. Nearly half of business leaders admitted that they spend most of their time fighting fires. In that post, my colleague Ides Ticket highlighted 4 recurring patterns that create this endless cycle of firefighting.

  1. Too much to do at once, with inflow exceeding capacity.
  2. Unclear decisions and excessive consensus slowing things down.
  3. Lack of ownership and project management.
  4. Overflowing inboxes and too many meetings stealing time from what really matters.

The patterns themselves are easy to recognise. What’s more interesting is what lies beneath them: the human dynamics that fan the flames. Why do we keep falling into the same traps, even when we know better? Let’s discuss a few:

1. Choosing Is Losing

One of the hardest things for any professional is deciding what not to do. We are wired to want more, to avoid missing out, to keep options open. Yet… did you know that the word decision comes from the Latin dēcīdere, which means “to cut off”? True decision-making is an act of pruning. Just as in gardening, growth requires cutting back.

When inflow exceeds capacity, it’s rarely because leaders don’t know about prioritisation. It’s because saying no feels painful: to customers, to colleagues, to ourselves. The inability to cut off fuels queues, overstretched teams, and makes small issues turn into big incidents.

2. Decision Fatigue

Our cognitive energy is finite. Every decision, from approving expenses to shaping strategy, depletes it. As the day wears on, quality drops: we delay, default to consensus, or dodge decisions altogether. That’s why so many projects stall in endless discussions: not because people don’t care, but because they are mentally drained.

Leaders often underestimate how much energy is required for effective decisions. Protecting that energy by reducing unnecessary choices and creating clear decision rights is key to keeping things moving.

So, it’s not indifference; it’s exhaustion. Without clear decision rights and routines to protect energy, projects stall in endless discussions.

3. Ownership Evaporation

Another recurring dynamic is the diffusion of responsibility. When roles are fuzzy, or when accountability is shared too widely, ownership quietly slips away. People hesitate to take charge if they fear they lack the authority or resources to deliver. Worse, in cultures where mistakes are punished, individuals prefer to keep their heads down rather than risk failure.

The result? Work ping-pongs between teams, “done” means different things to different people, and projects drag on far longer than they should.

4. The Fear of Friction

Humans are social animals. We want to be liked, to maintain harmony, to avoid blame. We avoid conflict.

These instincts serve us well in many contexts, but in organisations they can become costly. Leaders delay tough decisions to keep the peace. Teams seek endless consensus to avoid conflict. Meetings multiply, not because they’re needed, but because they feel safer than making a call.

5. The Dopamine Trap

Then there’s the lure of short-term rewards. Every email answered, every meeting attended gives us a small dopamine hit.  A quick hit of satisfaction.  We feel productive, responsive, in control. But these hits distract us from the real game-changers; the strategic priorities and must-win battles.

It’s not that emails and meetings are unimportant. They keep the machine running. But when they dominate our attention, they leave little room for the deeper, slower work that actually drives progress. The inbox too easily becomes the to-do list of other people’s priorities.  Our attention is limited. Constant switching between emails, calls and meetings drains quality. Distractions pile up, rework grows, and preventable issues become fires.

“From Firefighting to flow” requires leadership

The solution isn’t another process or tool. It’s leadership. That means:

  • Setting clear decision rights.
  • Limiting work in progress and protecting capacity.
  • Normalising failure and disagreement to foster ownership.
  • Guarding focus and energy for the work that truly matters.
  • Rewarding flow and outcomes, not busyness.

Firefighting feels urgent, even heroic. But true leadership is creating the conditions where fires don’t start in the first place. By addressing the human dynamics at the root, we move from activity to flow – and create space for growth, clarity and impact. At Business Markers, this is exactly where we step in. As sherpas, we stand beside leaders and teams to help them cut through the noise, make courageous choices, and build the conditions where focus and flow replace firefighting. Whether the challenge is strategic, leadership or operational, we guide organisations towards sustainable growth and impact.

Want to know more? We’re only a few clicks away 😉

⸻

About the author

Bob De Rydt, Partner at Business Markers, combines 19 years of international leadership experience with a passion for strategy, customer experience and developing people. He guides organisations through positioning, strategy and customer journeys, and is a seasoned trainer in presentation skills and leadership.

⸻

Stay ahead with our latest insights

Get fresh perspectives, practical ideas, and industry updates delivered directly to your LinkedIn feed. Subscribe to our LinkedIn newsletter and never miss an insight.

Real stories. Real impact.

Discover how we help organisations turn strategy into action through co-creation, focus and execution that delivers lasting results.